{"id":746,"date":"2017-10-24T14:51:48","date_gmt":"2017-10-24T14:51:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/students.pingry.org\/record\/?p=746"},"modified":"2018-07-24T14:52:00","modified_gmt":"2018-07-24T14:52:00","slug":"leaning-into-discomfort-in-a-partisan-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/students.pingry.org\/record\/2017\/10\/24\/leaning-into-discomfort-in-a-partisan-world\/","title":{"rendered":"Leaning into Discomfort in a Partisan World"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4><strong>By Miro Bergam (V)<\/strong><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u201cLean into discomfort.\u201d This phrase may sound familiar from the multiple diversity assemblies you\u2019ve been asked to attend in your years at Pingry. It is a part of a list of \u201cconversation norms\u201d that Pingry\u2019s diversity work is grounded in. For many people, this phrase and the list of norms have gone in one ear and out the other. However, I have found that recently, the world that surrounds us has given these norms more context. In particular, I believe the political conversations our country is currently engaging in and the way they translate tangibly into our interpersonal relationships and lives at Pingry has made the norm of leaning into discomfort a necessity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">I had this realization at a leadership workshop hosted by Pingry\u2019s diversity department this past August. Student leaders from sports teams, clubs, Student Government, SDLC, and Honor Board were asked to attend this training session, which involved engaging in different activities led by John Gentile, a diversity practitioner who specializes in working with white males.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the latter half of the activity, the white males at the workshop were isolated into their own group. For the first few minutes, the group was dead silent. The silence was killing the whole intention of holding such a group: everyone was supposed to lean into discomfort and air out the white male opinions that are often overlooked in diversity work. But once people started participating, lightning struck the room: it was uncomfortable, it was problematic, and heads were clashing, but it was exactly what we needed. Everyone leaned a little bit out of their comfort zones, and it unearthed a landmine of opinions we desperately needed to addressed and confront in our world of white supremacist marches and national anthem debates.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Last week, Mr. Conard delivered a much needed speech addressing these conflicts. He shared his own opinion denouncing the white supremacists who marched in Charlottesville, and he commented on the way our current atmosphere politicizes every aspect of our lives, even including our day-to-day conversations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">One of his main points was that although he finds the white supremacists\u2019 stances abhorrent, he believes \u201cthey have a right to voice their opinions.\u201d This may strike some people as the opposite of what we should be doing\u2014if their opinions are \u201cwrong,\u201d then why should we even give them a platform? Along the lines of Mr. Conard\u2019s statement, I argue that continuing to push these repulsive opinions under the radar is simply feeding a large, silent beast of discontent and frustration that is occasionally released in horrifying moments like the white supremacist rallies that have swept Charlottesville.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Through hearing out the opinions of Pingry\u2019s white males at the leadership workshop this summer and listening to dissenting opinions as a leader of the white affinity group, I have learned that the endgame is not always about coming to an agreement, changing someone\u2019s mind, or \u201cwinning\u201d the argument. All it takes is a dialogue and platform that respects both sides, regardless of how ugly each person thinks the other\u2019s opinions are, to begin chipping away at the massive divide that seems to have polarized our country and school recently. Simply honoring someone\u2019s opinion by hearing it out, regardless of whether or not you agree with it, builds a sense of mutual respect.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The key to this is leaning into discomfort. If you have a far left opinion that you think no one will take seriously, lean into discomfort and voice it. If you have a far right opinion that you feel has no place at Pingry, step out of your comfort zone and let it be known. I believe Mr. Conard did an amazing job of stepping out of his comfort zone to address the school on such a contentious issue\u2014setting an example we should be seeing more often from our school\u2019s leadership in such divided times. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">I urge you to follow his lead: join the open forums, attend affinity groups, and engage in difficult conversations. As long as you hold these dialogues in a productive way, without the goal of \u201cwinning\u201d over or \u201cbeating\u201d others, then you should find spaces to voice your opinion and lean all the way into discomfort. In Mr. Conard\u2019s words, \u201cI encourage you to engage in respectful dialogue about these issues\u2014they are not going to go away.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Miro Bergam (V) \u201cLean into discomfort.\u201d This phrase may sound familiar from the multiple diversity assemblies you\u2019ve been asked to attend in your years at Pingry. It is a part of a list of \u201cconversation norms\u201d that Pingry\u2019s diversity work is grounded in. For many people, this phrase and the list of norms have [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":53,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[12,13],"class_list":["post-746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-opinion","tag-op-ed","tag-opinion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/students.pingry.org\/record\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/students.pingry.org\/record\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/students.pingry.org\/record\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/students.pingry.org\/record\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/students.pingry.org\/record\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=746"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/students.pingry.org\/record\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/746\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":747,"href":"https:\/\/students.pingry.org\/record\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/746\/revisions\/747"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/students.pingry.org\/record\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/53"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/students.pingry.org\/record\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/students.pingry.org\/record\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/students.pingry.org\/record\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}